The principle that "no one is above the law" is only one aspect of the "rule law of law." It's more fully expressed and realized by the Constitutional prohibition against "Bills of Attainder."
Let’s cut to the chase dumb fuck. The definition of “militia” at the time were men of fighting age, and others outside of those parameters deemed fit to fight. There was no standing army. Only officers. Therefore, the Second Amendment never even alludes, let alone refers to citizens not members of the “militia”. Today those people are members of what we called “the armed services” or the “military”.
Now, we can both agree that Congress has the complete and only purview to arm the militia.
So you really are going to make the argument that they also don’t have the purview to arm or disarm a common person on the street not being a member of? Do you have no relationship to critical thinking whatsoever. Not even coincidentally.
Let’s cut to the chase dumb fuck. The definition of “militia” at the time were men of fighting age, and others outside of those parameters deemed fit to fight. There was no standing army. Only officers. Therefore, the Second Amendment never even alludes, let alone refers to citizens not members of the “militia”. Today those people are members of what we called “the armed services” or the “military”.
Now, we can both agree that Congress has the complete and only purview to arm the militia.
So you really are going to make the argument that they also don’t have the purview to arm or disarm a common person on the street not being a member of? Do you have no relationship to critical thinking whatsoever. Not even coincidentally.